Divorce Law for Physicians & Dentists Who Own Practices

This article discusses strategies regarding medical and dental practices for physicians and dentists who own private practices and may be going through a divorce process in Maryland.

Did you know that the medical or dental office that you own is most likely considered marital property and your spouse could claim a financial interest in it if you are going through a divorce? Whether and to what extent your practice or ownership interest in a practice (if you are a part owner in a practice) is considered marital or non-marital property depends on when you acquired your practice relative to the date of your marriage and/or whether any marital funds were used to pay for any loans, improvements, or for other purposes for your practice, even if you owned your practice prior to your marriage, inherited it, or if it was gifted to you.

Your spouse can almost never become a shareholder, member, or a partner in your medical or dental practice after your divorce for a couple of reasons. First, if they are not a doctor or a dentist, they do not have the required license to become an owner of medical or dental practice under Maryland law. Second, usually shareholders’ agreements, bylaws, operating agreements, or partnership agreements include provisions that restrict the transfer of ownership interest even if your spouse has the required medical or dental license. If you don’t yet have those provisions in your corporate documents then they should  be reviewed and amended to provide those additional protections for you.

Your spouse’s recourse is usually to try to put a price tag on the value of your practice or your interest in your practice and then try to obtain a monetary award based on the equitable division of marital portion of your interest in the practice. Keep in mind that your spouse’s monetary award will not be the entire value of your interest in the practice because the value of your interest in the practice should be equitably divided, which could be ½ of the value, less than ½, or more than ½ of the value depending on many factors listed in Maryland Code, Family Law § 8-205(b).

Therefore, the valuation of your practice becomes crucial and can make a material difference in the outcome of your case. But the valuation of your practice for divorce purposes could be significantly lower than the valuation of your practice for the purpose of selling it. One of the major factors or defenses that you can invoke is that the substantial amount of the value of your practice consists of your personal goodwill, which in Maryland is considered non-martial property.

In Maryland, doctors, dentists, and other medical professionals are among those who could claim one of the highest levels of personal goodwill (depending on the circumstances of the case) and therefore minimizing the value of their practices for divorce purposes, which will result in great reduction in your spouse’s monetary interest in the marital portion of your medical or dental office. In Maryland, the court is also required to consider discounts for lack of marketability and lack of control if you are not the sole owner of the practice, which can further reduce the value of your practice for divorce purposes. A family lawyer experienced in representing doctors and dentists can navigate these complex issues to settle your case or litigate it in Maryland family law courts.

Finally, other than your practice you almost inevitably have other marital property, whether real or personal property, which could be used to off-set the value of your practice. For example, if you own a house that has equity or if your spouse owns an interest in a property that is more valuable than your interest, then the value of your spouse’s interest in those properties can be used to off-set the value of your practice. If you are trying to settle your case and reach an agreement with your spouse, then there can certainly be some “horse-trading” to help you reach a settlement.

Please note that this article is written specifically based on Maryland law. CLICK HERE for additional information regarding our Bethesda family lawyers if you are seeking representation in your divorce and/or child custody case. For our Rockville divorce lawyers and representation in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County CLICK HERE!

Book Your Consultation if you are a medical professional who owns your private practice.

A. Shane Kamkari, Esq.

ask@DentalMedicalAttorney.com

301-309-9002

Click Here for additional information regarding Maryland family law and services provided by our family lawyer.

In Strauss v. Strauss,101 Md. App. 490, 647 A.2d 818 (1994) Maryland Court of Special Appeals provided an in-depth analysis of valuation of dental and medical practices in divorce cases. The Court reiterated Maryland law that personal goodwill is not considered marital property and therefore should not be considered as part of the valuation of a practice in divorce cases. That means the personal goodwill portion of the valuation for dental and medical practices are non-marital property of the dentists or doctors who own their practices and not subject to equitable division of marital assets. The following is an excerpt of the Court’s Ruling:

“As background, we note that it is well established in Maryland law that goodwill, although an intangible asset, is nonetheless a legally protected property right. Archer, 303 Md. at 356, 493 A.2d 1074; Schill v. Remington Putnam Co., 179 Md. 83, 88-89, 17 A.2d 175 (1941); Green v. Green, 64 Md. App. 122, 134, 494 A.2d 721 (1985). Based on this status, the goodwill of a spouse’s business is to be valued and equitably divided pursuant to the three step marital property analysis. Nevertheless, when the business in question is a sole professional practice, owners have claimed that any goodwill inuring to the entity is not marital property, but, rather, a direct reflection of the owner’s reputation and skill and therefore “uniquely personal” to the holder. This rationale was first acknowledged in Maryland in Brown v. Benzinger, 118 Md. 29, 36, 84 A. 79 (1912), in which the Court distinguished between the sale of the good will of a trade or business of a commercial character where the location is an important feature of the business, and the sale of an established practice and goodwill of a person engaged in a profession or calling where the income therefrom is the immediate or direct result of his labor and skill and where integrity, skill, ability and other desirable personal qualities follow the person and not the place.” 

You can find the Court’s decision in its entirety at Strauss v. Strauss :: 1994 :: Maryland Court of Special Appeals Decisions :: Maryland Case Law :: Maryland Law :: US Law :: Justf


family lawyer for doctors, family lawyers for physicians, divorce lawyer for doctors in Maryland, family lawyer for dentists, divorce lawyers for dentists

Legal Representation in:

Buying & Selling Dental, Medical, & Veterinary Practices

Buy-in or Buy-out of Partnerships for Practices

Lease Agreements for Dental, Medical, & Veterinary Practices

Real Estate Contracts for Purchasing Office Space

Start-up of New Dental, Medical, and Veterinary Offices

Associate Employment Contracts

Litigation of Contract & Partnership Disputes

Family Law Representation for Dentists & Doctors Who Own Private Practices

Share this post

Disclaimer

Disclaimer No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Use of this Website. Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Kamkari Healthcare Law (hereinafter “Law Offices”) or one of its lawyer(s) creates an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Offices and/or any of its attorneys. You will become a client of the Law Offices only if and when you sign and engagement agreement setting forth the scope of the Law Offices’ engagement, the fee arrangement and other relevant matters. As a matter of policy, the Law Offices does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed retainer agreement or engagement letter. (The Law Offices may, for example, already represent another party involved in your matter.) No Confidentiality. You may not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to the Law Offices. Your use of this website does not make you a client of the Law Offices or even a prospective client of the Law Offices. If you have confidential information that you would like to give to any lawyer affiliated with the Law Offices, please communicate with one if the Law Offices’ lawyer(s) in person or by telephone–not by filling in any form on this website or by sending an unsolicited email to the Law Offices or any of its lawyer(s). No Legal Advice Intended. This website includes general information about legal issues and developments in the law. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and must not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You need to contact a lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction for advice on specific legal issues problems. No Intent to Refer Matters to Other Firms. Unless otherwise expressly stated on a particular page of the Law Offices’ website, retainer agreement, or engagement letter, Law Offices intends to act as primary counsel in representing clients who retain the Attorney. Photographs. The photographs on this website may not be of actual lawyer(s), employees and/or clients of the Law Offices unless otherwise noted. The cost of this website is paid for by the Law Offices and not by any other lawyer or firm. No Guarantee of Results. Some of the case summaries, reports of past results and individual lawyer biographies on this website describe past matters handled for clients of the Law Offices. These descriptions are meant only to provide information to the public about the activities and experience of our lawyer(s). They are not intended as a guarantee that the same or similar results can be obtained in every matter undertaken by our lawyer(s). You must not assume that a similar result can be obtained in a legal matter of interest to you. The outcome of a particular matter can depend on a variety of factors—including the specific factual and legal circumstances, the ability of opposing counsel, and, often, unexpected developments beyond the control of any client or lawyer. No Claim of Expertise or Board Certification. This website lists areas in which lawyer(s) of the Law Offices practice. In so doing, no Law Offices’ lawyer makes a claim of “expertise,” “specialization” or “board certification.” Any lawyer(s) of the Law Offices who are properly board certified in a practice area have so indicated in their biographies. IRS Circular 230 Notice. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service requirements, this is to inform you that any information on this website that could be construed as United States tax advice is not written or intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed on this website. See IRS Circular 230. Links to Third Party Websites. As a convenience, this website provides links to various third-party websites. Such linked websites are not under the control of the Law Offices, and the Law Offices assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the contents of such websites. Authorized Practice of Law. The jurisdictions in which each of the Law Offices’ lawyer(s) are licensed to practice are Maryland and the District of Columbia. The ability of any Law Offices’ lawyer to engage in any activities for a client outside of that lawyer’s state(s) of licensure is subject to state statutes, professional standards and court rules. The Law Offices does not seek, and this website is not intended to solicit, legal engagements in jurisdictions outside of our lawyer(s)’ states of licensure when such engagements would constitute the unauthorized practice of law in any jurisdiction. In certain occasions the Law Offices may engage and/or employ of-counsel in other jurisdictions should it be necessary to represent the client outside of Maryland and the Washington, DC. Responsible Lawyer. The Law Offices lawyer responsible for the content of this website is Afshin Shane Kamkari, Esq. Bona Fide Office. The Law Offices operates a bona fide office at 10411 Motor City Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817. Copyright. Copyright © by Kamkari Healthcare Law. All rights reserved. You may download and print out any part of this website for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other reproduction or retransmission of the contents of this website without our prior written consent is prohibited.

Book A Consultation

Request a Consultation

Download Our E-Book

Download E-Book

Your FREE E-book Guide on Buying & Selling Medical Practices will be sent to your email automatically on subscription.

You can unsubscribe at any time.
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
Shield Security